|
IMAGING PARAMETERS |
|||||||
|
Plane |
Sagittal |
Sagittal |
Axial |
Coronal |
Axial |
Coronal |
Axial |
|
Mode |
2D |
2D |
2D |
3D |
3D |
3D |
Cine |
|
Pulse Seq |
Spin Echo |
Spin Echo |
Spin Echo |
Vasc TOF SPGR |
Vasc PC |
Vasc TOF SPGR |
Vasc PC |
|
Imaging Options |
RC, NPW |
Fast, SS |
Fast, FC |
Fast, MPh, Zip2, Smartprep |
FC |
Fast, Zip2 |
-- |
|
SCAN TIMING |
|||||||
|
# of Echoes |
1 |
1 |
1, ETL=8 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
TE |
Min Full |
180 |
102 |
Minimum |
-- |
Minimum |
-- |
|
TR |
325 |
-- |
2920 |
-- |
18 |
6 |
18 |
|
Flip Angle |
-- |
-- |
-- |
45 |
25 |
45 |
30 |
|
Bandwidth |
-- |
31.25 |
-- |
31.25 |
-- |
31.25 |
-- |
|
ADDITIONAL PARAMETERS (see attached instructions) |
|||||||
|
SAT |
None |
None |
S,I, FAT |
None |
None |
None |
None |
|
ACQUISITION TIMING |
|||||||
|
Freq |
256 |
256 |
256 |
256 (256-512) |
256 |
256 |
256 |
|
Phase |
192 |
256 |
256 |
160 (128-256) |
192 |
160 |
160 |
|
NEX |
2 |
-- |
3 |
1 (0.5 - 1) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Phase FOV |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Locs Before Pause |
-- |
0 |
0 |
1 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
|
Freq DIR |
S/I |
S/I |
R/L |
S/I |
R/L |
S/I |
R/L |
|
|
Peak |
Water |
Water |
Water |
Water |
Water |
Water |
|
Auto Shim |
On |
On |
Off |
On |
Off |
On |
On |
|
Contrast |
-- |
-- |
-- |
30 (20-50) ml |
30 (20-50) ml |
30 (20-50) ml |
30 (20-50) ml |
|
SCANNING RANGE |
|||||||
|
FOV |
40 (32-48) |
40 (32-48) |
32 (26-44) |
34 (30-44) |
28 (26-40) |
32 (28-40) |
32 |
|
Slice Thickness |
8.0 |
9.0 |
8.0 (8-12) |
2.6 (2-4) |
2.5 (2-3) |
3.0 (2-5) |
3.0 |
|
Spacing |
Interleave |
0 |
2 (2-3) |
-- |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Start - End |
L90 - R90 |
L100-R100 |
|
||||
|
# Slices |
24 |
24 |
18 |
34 (28-44) |
28 (28 - 60) |
30 (20-40) |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scan Time (min:sec) |
4:39 |
0:56 |
4:46 |
0:30 (0:15-0:58) |
7:23 |
35 |
4:38 |
Patient Preparation:
Coil: With large patient (>200 lb), body coil is acceptable and easiest to use. It provides a large field-of-view (FOV) with homogeneous signal. Higher SNR is possible with the torso array coil although the signal reception is not as homogeneous because of hot spots near the coil. The torso coil is not useful in obese patients. When using the torso array, rotate 90 degrees for greater S/I coverage and less R/L wrap-around artifact. I have found that the higher SNR of the surface coils allows the standard gadolinium dose to be reduced from 40 to 30 ml in small and average size patients.
Patient Positioning: Supine, feet first.
Landmark: on lower anterior rib margin or just above iliac crest.

|
|
|
|
|
|
Spin Echo Locator |
SSFSE Locator |
||
This sequence helps to evaluate renal masses to determine if they are simple benign cysts or more suspicious for malignancy. It also keeps the scanner busy while you are setting up the 3D Gd MRA (series 3). If the patient has a regular respiratory rhythm, better image quality is possible with respiratory triggering. For respiratory triggering use:
|
|
|
|
Scanning Range for Axial T2 |
T2 weighted image shows benign cysts |
This is the main sequence for showing the aorto-iliac and renal artery anatomy. It is essential to have perfect gadolinium infusion timing so that central k-space data will be acquired during the arterial phase of the bolus. Use MR SmartPrep to ensure synchronization of central k-space with the contrast bolus peak.
Use longer Max Monitor Period and Image Acq. Delay in patients who have slow flow including patients older than 70, patients with congestive heart failure or patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm.
|
|
|
|
|
Positioning for Coronal Volume and Tracker |
Coronal 3D Gd MRA |
|

Series 4: Axial 3D Phase Contrast
This sequence provides another high resolution look at the renal arteries and helps in the evaluation of the hemodynamic significance of any renal artery lesions that are present.
|
|
|
|
Scanning Range for 3D PC |
Axial 3D Phase Contrast |
Series 5: Delayed 3D Gd Excretory Phase:
Routinely, the 3D gadolinium images are processed on the computer workstation. A montage 12 on 1 sheet or two 6 on 1 sheets are created including:
|
Re:
Exam:
Exam Date:
Clinical Statement:
Technique:
Sagittal T1 of abdomen and pelvis
Axial T2 of kidneys
Coronal 3D Gd:MRA of abdominal aorta and renal arteries
Axial 3D phase contrast MRA post-gadolinium
3D MRA data was reconstructed on a computer workstation
Findings:
Abdominal aorta:
Celiac axis:
Superior mesenteric A.
Inferior mesenteric A.
The right kidney measure ? cm in length. No right renal masses are identified.
There is a single right renal artery which is ? .
The left kidney measures ? cm in length. No left renal masses are identified.
There is a single left renal artery which is ? .
Right common iliac artery:
Right external iliac artery:
Right internal iliac artery:
Left common iliac artery:
left external iliac artery:
Left internal iliac artery:
No abdominal masses or retroperitoneal adenopathy is identified.
Impression:
Accuracy of 3D Gd:MRA for diagnosing Renal Artery for Stenosis.
|
Investigator |
Year |
Number of Patients |
Technique |
Sensitivity |
Specificity |
Degree of Stenosis |
|
Prince |
1995 |
19 |
3D Gd |
100% |
93% |
75% |
|
Grist |
1996 |
35 |
3D Gd |
89% |
95% |
>55% |
|
|
1996 |
63 |
3D Gd |
100% |
100% |
>50% |
|
Snidow |
1996 |
47 |
3D Gd |
100% |
89% |
NA |
|
Steffens |
1997 |
50 |
3D Gd |
96% |
95% |
NA |
|
Hany |
1997 |
39 |
|
93% |
98% |
>50% |
|
De Cobelli |
1997 |
55 |
3D Gd |
100% |
97% |
>50% |
|
Rieumont |
1997 |
30 |
3D Gd |
100% |
71% |
>50% |
|
Hany |
1998 |
103 |
3D Gd |
93% |
90% |
NA |
|
Bakker |
1998 |
50 |
3D Gd |
97% |
92% |
>50% |
|
|
1999 |
62 |
3D Gd |
88% |
98% |
|
|
Schoenberg |
1999 |
26 |
3D Gd |
94-100% |
96-100% |
|
|
Miller |
1999 |
32 |
3D PC |
93% |
81% |
|
|
|
1999 |
25 |
3D Gd + PC |
97% |
100% |
|
|
|
1999 |
42 |
3D Gd |
100% |
98% |
|
|
Ghantous |
1999 |
12 |
3D Gd |
--- |
100% |
|
|
Marchand |
2000 |
|
3D Gd |
88-100% |
71-100% |
|
|
Shetty |
2000 |
51 |
3D Gd |
96% |
92% |
|
|
Winterer |
2000 |
23 |
3D Gd |
100% |
98% |
|
|
Weishaupt |
2000 |
20 |
blood pool 3D |
82% |
98% |
|
|
Bongers |
2000 |
43 |
3D Gd |
100% |
94% |
|
|
Volk |
2000 |
40 |
time resolved 3D Gd |
93% |
83% |
|
|
Oberholzer |
2000 |
23 |
3D Gd at 1T |
96% |
97% |
|
|
Korst |
2000 |
38 |
3D Gd |
100% |
85% |
|
|
De Corbelli |
2000 |
45 |
3D Gd |
94% |
93% |
|
Example